Add support for flatpak
Description
Environment
Activity
Kepler Sticka-Jones November 3, 2022 at 4:31 PM
All Flatpak repositories are OSTree repositories under the hood, I'm linking this issue to .
Kepler Sticka-Jones November 3, 2022 at 4:30 PM
We were hoping to use Artifactory to host a Flatpak (OSTree) repository and were encouraged by a presentation that used to be available at https://jfrog.com/user-conference/securing-device-updates-with-yocto-and-ostree/, but has since disappeared and redirects to https://jfrog.com/.
The talk this exists on the WayBack Machine (https://web.archive.org/web/20201020080247/https://jfrog.com/user-conference/securing-device-updates-with-yocto-and-ostree/) and YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/embed/AxdixLCXc80).

Andrew Van Uitert November 3, 2022 at 3:31 PMEdited
My company is currently using artifactory for an internal distribution mechanism. However, we are adopting flatpak and plan to migrate to a cloud instance of artifatory but we can't since flatpak is not supported in artifactory.
Can you please add support for flatpak?
For those who stumble across this comment, you might want to check out https://pulpproject.org/ since they have ostree/flatpak support.
By the way, I cannot vote on this issue.

Evgeny Karasik December 7, 2020 at 12:38 PM
The request is not getting traction at the moment - not enough votes for implementing that, hence deferred.

Emanuel Bennici December 27, 2019 at 7:29 AM
We are also interessted using that Feature
Details
Assignee
UnassignedUnassignedReporter
CD-LinuxCD-LinuxLabels
Sub-Type
New FeaturePriority
4 - Normal
Details
Details
Assignee
Reporter

Alongside snap package support, it would be very nice to have flatpak support. Both to host own repositories, and to proxy flathub.org.
I've already tried setting up a generic remote repository inside Artifactory, but that doesn't work for Flatpak.
This method should provide a safer way to install application with better isolation to reduce possible collisions in dependencies.